🔗 Share this article

The iPhone maker may have to allow competitors to operate their own application platforms on Apple devices across Britain, following a ruling from the market watchdog.

This represents a significant change to the company's well-known "walled garden" where apps can only be downloaded from its own official marketplace.

But the UK competition watchdog has designated both the tech giants as having "dominant market position" - indicating they have significant control over smartphone ecosystems.

Watchdog Assessment

The CMA said the two companies "could be restricting innovation and competition".

But the authority clarified it did not "determine or presume wrongdoing" from the firms.

"Mobile applications contributes 1.5% of the British economy and sustains around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's essential these sectors work well for enterprises," stated a top executive from the CMA.

Approximately 90-100% of British smartphones operate using Apple or Google's mobile platforms, creating what the authority calls an "effective duopoly".

According to current data, 48.5% of British smartphone users use an iPhone - which runs Apple's iOS - with the overwhelming bulk of the remaining users using Google's Android.

The Company's Reaction

The regulatory probe focused on how prominent the companies' own applications are compared with competitors - as well as their browsers and operating systems.

It is unclear what modifications the authority will look to request, but previously it published roadmaps outlining potential measures it could take.

These include requiring it to be easier for people to transition between Apple and Android devices, and for both companies to list applications "fairly and openly" in their app stores.

The Cupertino company specifically may be compelled to allow third-party marketplaces on its devices, and let people to install apps straight from companies' websites.

This would follow comparable regulations in the European Union, which previously imposed measures against Apple for restrictive practices.

Apple warned the United Kingdom could lose access to getting new features - as has occurred in the EU - which the organization blames on strict rules.

For example, some AI capabilities which have been launched in other regions are not available in the EU.

"We encounters fierce competition in every sector where we operate, and we strive continuously to create the best products, solutions and customer interface," the organization said in a release.

"Britain's implementation of EU-style rules would undermine that, resulting in consumers with weaker privacy and security, slower availability to new features, and a fragmented, less seamless experience."

Google's Standpoint

Android users can presently use third-party app stores - though commentators say they are not as smooth as Google's own application marketplace.

The regulator's plan said Google may have to "change the user experience" of installing applications directly from online sources, as well as "remove user frictions" when using alternative app stores.

"We simply do not see the rationale for today's designation decision," a company competition lead stated.

The executive said "the majority" of Google device owners use third-party platforms or download apps directly from a developer's website, and asserted there is a far greater range of apps available for Android users versus those on Apple devices.

"Currently available are twenty-four thousand Android phone models from thirteen hundred phone manufacturers worldwide, facing strong rivalry from iOS in the UK," the representative continued.

Android is an open-source operating system, which means creators can utilize and develop on top of it for free.

The company contends this means it opens up competition.

But consumer groups said restrictions on these firms' dominance in other countries "currently assist enterprises to innovate and providing consumers more choice".

"Their dominance is now creating genuine problems by restricting choice for consumers and market rivalry for businesses," commented a consumer advocate.